Under the Sea (Shreya Lingam)
Who doesn’t love relaxing beaches? Having fun under the sun?One of the things to always check off your to do list before a trip usually always includes packing sunscreen for a a pleasant beach going experience. But, how does the seemingly innocent and protective nature of sunscreens effect the environment?
Generally, sunscreens are divided into two categories: chemical and mineral sunscreens. Chemical sunscreens, 70% of which contain oxybenzone, convert UV rays into less harmful rays by absorbing and reducing the ability of UV rays to penetrate the skin. Alternatively, mineral sunscreens actually physically block light from your skin by blocking or reflecting UV A and UV B rays and are typically comprised of the ingredients zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.
How though are sunscreens causing the significant deaths of coral reefs? The problem is that a 2016 study conducted by Craig Downs and others at the Haereticus Environmental Laboratory has demonstrated that both oxybenzone and octinoxate, which end up in the water by chemical sunscreens washing off through showering and swimming, are responsible for slowing the growth of coral and increasing the rate of coral bleaching. Coral bleaching involves such a drastic temperature change that causes symbiotic algae to die off and turn the corals completely white in appearance, which makes them susceptible to harmful algae, disease, and death. Also, oxybenzone has proven to be an endocrine disrupter where the epidermal cells of coral larvae turn into a skeleton at the wrong point in time, and cause larvae to stop swimming and to die.
This has caused Hawaiian Governor David Ige to sign a bill in early July of 2018 that banned selling popular sunscreens such as Banana Boat and Coppertone, which are composed of the ingredients oxybenzone and octinoxate, and will go into effect in 2021. A study performed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that the coral reefs in Hawaii are worth approximately $33.57 billion. The Hawaiian coral reefs not only attract attention from tourists, which contributes to Hawaii’s booming tourism industry, but they also serve to protect coasts from storms and erosion and can serve as habitats for numerous marine animals. Around 6,000 to 14,000 tons of sunscreen end up in the coral reefs year, indicating that some sort of action must be taken in order to preserve the world’s coral reefs in order to minimize any damage wrought upon both the marine ecosystem and humans as well.
The problem is that limited research has shown that mineral sunscreens are no better than chemical sunscreens. Cinzia Corinaldesi and her fellow colleagues at the Polytechnic University of Marche in Ancona, Italy have been testing supposedly coral reef friendly mineral sunscreens since 2009 and have concluded that these mineral sunscreens are just as detrimental as zinc oxide has been found to contribute significantly to coral bleaching through damage to algae. Furthermore, the ban has implied that sunscreens are not safe enough to use, which poses a tremendous risk to the public as they might stop wearing sunscreen altogether as advised by dermatologists who claim that this could expose beach goers and tourists to the risk of skin cancer. The Hawaiian ban in particular also poses some limitations as both sunscreen can easily be smuggled into Hawaii as well as many other products such as cosmetics also contain ingredients like oxybenzone. Ultimately, a lot more research needs to be conducted into the extent of the harmful effects of both chemical and mineral sunscreens on the marine ecosystem and more viable alternatives need to be actually presented. So, what are other anthropogenic causes of degradation of the marine ecosystem? What other feasible ways can we protect both the coral reefs and our health?
Sources:
Comments
-ADam Ghanem
-Hannah Lee